Austerity Versus Green Growth for Puerto Rico

Recently I attended a presentation by Dr. Robert Pollin of the University of Massachusetts-Amherst, sponsored by the Centro Hemisférico de Cooperación (CoHemis) at UPRM.  The title of his talk was  Austerity Versus Green Growth for Puerto Rico.  The thesis of the presentation was that green energy is in fact the solution to our economic problems in Puerto Rico.  The pdf version of the paper by the same title is available for download at the following link:

Puerto Rico will not be able to turn its economy around through imposed austerity measures.  The result will lead to extreme uncertainty for investors, continuous exodus of our younger population, a contracting tax base, severe erosion in the quality of our public education, reduction in public services in general, negative economic growth, etc, etc.  Austerity Versus Green Growth for Puerto Rico argues that there is a much better alternative.  The alternative is primarily based on a carbon tax on fossil fuel (approximately 1 cent per gallon of gasoline), which will allow Puerto Rico to transition to 100% green energy by 2050. In their plan, the carbon tax would be used to provide investment funding for renewable energy (combined with private investment), provide rebates for low income people who would be most affected by a carbon tax, and to service the Government debt (currently around $70 billion).  The advantages of the plan include the following: Approximately $4 billion per year that is currently being spent on imported fossil fuel would be invested back into the island’s economy; the green energy used in the island will be up to three times less expensive than the imported fossil fuel; the net job creation through both clean energy investments and energy import substitution would result in an increase in 25,000 jobs by 2020 and up to 80,000 jobs by 2050; energy efficiencies (e.g., public transportation, home solar energy systems, hybrid and electric cars) will reduce expenses for families; Puerto Rico will be able to recover more rapidly from natural disasters like Hurricane Maria; and as an added bonus, Puerto Rico would essentially eliminate its greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, thereby contributing to the goals of the Paris Agreement, which aims as maintaining global average air temperatures below 2 degrees Centigrade.

Please contact your Representative or Senator and let them know your opinion on this issue.

Eric Harmsen,


3 thoughts on “Austerity Versus Green Growth for Puerto Rico

  1. Hi, Eric. Thanks for the paper. I am all for this transition to solar energy with a little bit of wind. One item that I brought up after María is the need to update the construction codes for solar farms, since María showed that they are inadequate. There are codes in California and other states adopted from chapters of the American Institute of Civil Engineers, that can provide the basis for a code that would minimize the impacts of hurricanes on the farms. The solar farms at several sites in PR were torn to pieces due to failure in the construction codes.


    Ferdinand Quiñones ________________________________

    • Excellent suggestion. Its relatively easy for a homeowner to take down their panels when they know a hurricane is coming, but that is not an option for the solar farms. Thanks Ferdinand.

  2. Pingback: Green Growth Is The Best Strategy for Puerto Rico -- #CleanTechnica Interview | CleanTechnica

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.